There is not a perfect Constitution. All of them, including ours, are dependent on honest and trustworthy men and women if they are to survive, over time, the trials of men of devious character. Our Constitution is not an entirely original document. Much of its brilliance was handed down to our "Founding Fathers" who, with much thought and debate, shaped it into the extraordinary document that it is.
Being a justice of “The Supreme Court” is a responsibility that
should only be entrusted to those who can separate their personal philosophy
from the duties of interpreting the Constitution of the United States. Regarding the recent "Hobby Lobby" decision, the dissenting arguments by the female
justices and the one male justice whose blood supply seems to contain more
estrogen than testosterone, is proof that the ladies are not up to that
responsibility.
|
Thomas Jefferson
|
Thomas Jefferson said:
“On every question of construction [let us] carry ourselves back to the
time when the Constitution was adopted [and] recollect the spirit manifested in
the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text
or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.”
|
Kagan
|
|
Ginsburg
|
|
Sotomayor
|
|
Breyer
|
It is a noteworthy fact that three of the four dissenting opinions were from the only women on the bench! I would like to remind Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan, and
Breyer that their task is not to interpret the Constitution to make it fit
their own personal leanings, but to interpret it in the spirit of the original
designers: the founding fathers.
No comments:
Post a Comment